Progressives off Track in Bemoaning Foreclosure

Somehow I got on the mailing list for Mom’s Rising. It’s a progressive newsletter focused on mothers’ issues. Today’s mailing was about foreclosure. Progressives are really on the wrong track with this issue. They show a person with a sympathetic-looking headshot but provide no details on why she can't pay her bills.

The unbelievable part of it is that OneWest — her bank — doesn’t even have to talk with my mom before selling her house right out from under her.

I wish they had said what they want the bank to talk about. Does Mom's Rising want them to call her and say, "So what did you do with all that money we gave you?" and then try to get her to give them a sob story?

Today, right now in fact, members of our partner organization, ACORN, are sitting-in at the offices of OneWest and the other three banks whose mortgage servicing companies won’t sign on to Obama’s Making Home Affordable plan.

I usually look up to people participating in a sit-in, but they're doing one to stand up for the right for people not to pay their bills? This position alienates everyone except for extremists who don’t believe in private property.

Foreclosure is a great thing for the consumer:

• The borrower usually is not responsible for the deficit balance if they owe more than the house is worth.
• The borrower doesn’t have to make payments during the foreclosure process.
• The foreclosure process takes several months, sometimes a year.
• In four year’s time the borrower will be eligible for another partially gov’t subsidized home loan, even though they didn’t pay their last home loan as agreed.
• Right now there are plenty of good deals on rentals because the real estate bubble led to excess supply.
  

What more do people want? This issue of how to handle people who don’t pay their mortgage humanely has been solved. Organizations like Moms Rising should focus on problems at that really exist. Complaining about foreclosure just furthers the erroneous image that liberals just want take wealth (in this case mortgage contracts) from productive people and give to the undeserving.

A Premier on Electromagnetic Interference (EMI)

The June 25, 2009 edition of Electronic Design magazine has a great four page primer on electromagnetic interference (EMI)- The Dark Force Of Evil In Electronics: Electromagnetic Interference.

The basics of EMI for non-engineers:
EMI is unwanted signals coming from (and occasionally getting into) electronic equipment. The most common type of EMI is noise from high-speed digital lines, i.e. lines that communicate a series of 1s and 0s. If the transition between 1s and 0s happen very fast and/or the wire carrying that signal is very long, the wire will radiate signals that can interfere with other electronic equipment. Signals normally travel down a wire at about 180ps (that’s 180 trillionths of a second) per inch. So if your wire is one inch long and a transition from 0 to 1 takes 1,000ps, you can treat the wire as a single element. If your wire is 10 inches long, however, one end of the wire can have completed its 1,000ps-long transition before the other end has seen even the beginning of this transition. A wire with a different signal on each side can act as an antenna transmitting unwanted signals. (This is just one possible cause of EMI.) A lot of electrical engineering is making sure high speed signals get from one place to another without being distorted or causing interference.

I like how the article begins with what sounds like engineers’ excuses when their product fails EMI testing:

Is there an electronic product or circuit that’s not susceptible to electromagnetic interference (EMI)? For that matter, are any devices EMI-free? Simply put, no.

Come on, nobody's perfect, hey?

On a more serious note, I like how it mentions that static discharges can cause EMI in a product (rather than the usual case of a product just emitting unwanted signals):

Don’t forget electrostatic discharge (ESD) as an interfering source. ESD, of course, is the momentary current flow that occurs when a high voltage between two points is dissipated. Lightning is the most powerful example, but any static discharge can produce EMI and damage unprotected circuits.

I experienced this the hard way last year on one of my projects.

A premier like the one in Electronic Design should be required reading for EE students.

Please Dismantle Employment Captive Healthcare

I would like to thank the health insurance industry for giving me an argument in favor of a government-run health plan.

From the AP:

The insurance industry Tuesday laid down a marker on health care, warning in stark terms that a proposed government insurance plan would dismantle the employer coverage Americans have relied on for a half century and overtake the system.

I am generally against a federal healthcare plan, but industry groups America's Health Insurance Plans and Blue Cross Blue Shield Association have pointed out one good thing about it: It would dismantle employment captive insurance.

See my earlier post about why employment captive insurance is so bad.

I don't want a federal program, but I have hopes that such a program would help the poor. The program’s availability to the middle class would be a fig leaf to distinguish the program from outright charity. Responsible middle class people would probably use it and then use their own money in cases where they want better service, just as the middle class uses Social Security's disability / life insurances and retirement benefits as a small supplement to products they buy in the market.

I suspect (but will never know) insurers would protest louder if we had a libertarian government making open plans to dismantle the employment captive system and encourage true competition at an individual level.

GOP Needs Positive Message on Healthcare

According to a CBS News poll, 72% of Americans and 50% of Republicans favor a government run health insurance plan. The would seem to be bad for the Republican party, whose platform is against government running any businesses.

I suspect the reason Americans appear to support government health insurance is that there are problems with the current system and the only option to fix it that they have heard is a government-run plan. The main problem with the current system is health insurance is often tied to employment. If someone gets sick, they may be afraid to change jobs because they will not be able to keep their current insurance plan and may not be able to get a comparable new policy because of their newly preexisting condition.

I propose the Republicans admit that this is a huge problem and propose a law that prevents insurers from canceling someone’s policy on account of a job change. When a company writes a policy, they would free to take into account the same risk factors they do now, but they would have to continue offering insurance as long as the insured continued to pay his bills.

Demonizing a government plan really turns me off. A government plan would be okay, and it would do something to help the poor and those who aren’t diligent about paying their bills. A positive message about a minor change that could fix what bothers people about their current insurance would be much better.