CR says it's more likely that losses rose suddenly than that they rose slowly but FSA "didn't get the news" right away.
CR suggests a reason: People were living off these HELOCs. When house prices went down, they couldn't continue living off them.
I agree with all of this. I disagree with interpretations (other people's not CR's) of these facts that they are a sign of a fundamental problem with the US economy. Rather, I think there is always a segment that doesn't have its act together. These people would struggle regardless of what developments occur in the economy. There are many things in life they don't prepare for. You could similarly find a bunch of stories about people who need disability insurance but didn't buy it.
The HELOC situation gets our attention because we can see the results of failure to plan in default numbers on specific packages of loans. We see those numbers and know many people are struggling. It's similar to the moment of morbid fascination reporters on the excellent show This American Life: The Giant Pool of Money experienced when a mortgage servicer showed them the patterns of people getting barely caught up on their mortgages and then falling further behind. These are lives we're looking at, they exclaimed. When we see a group of people struggling together, we feel for them, want to help them, maybe curse them for failing to plan ahead, and worry that their troubles will become a problem for everyone.
People who argue that the problems experienced by this group will be a problem for everyone need to provide evidence that people are struggling significantly more than on average. So far I'm not believing it. These people get our attention because:
- They come in groups that provide summarized figures.
- The troubles affect major investment firms.
- If you report the facts about their cases selectively, they can appear more sympathetic than other cases of people doing irresponsible things.
- Some people's memories don't go back to the recession of '91, so they think this is totally new.
Although some may find his tone off-putting. Russ Winter's Blog generally provides a lot of data to support his arguments.
ReplyDeleteIf you went there and trolled through his back posts and then you made a reasoned argument as to why the data is not worse, your "show me the misery" argument would be more persuasive.
CR has a good site, but it is the wrong place to find the numbers you are looking for.